Who is this nut?

My photo
"You need to believe in things that aren't true. How else can they become?" T. Pratchett

30.1.09

File Under: Pluto and Asteroids

I'm pretty sure astro-physicists aren't supposed to be this interesting.

3 comments:

Laurel Kornfeld said...

Pluto is NOT an asteroid. It is a planet. Unlike most objects in the Kuiper Belt, it has attained hydrostatic equilibrium, meaning it has enough self-gravity to have pulled itself into a round shape. When an object is large enough for this to happen, it becomes differentiated with core, mantle, and crust, just like Earth and the larger planets, and develops the same geological processes as the larger planets, processes that inert asteroids and most KBOs do not have.

Not distinguishing between shapeless asteroids and objects whose composition clearly makes them planets is a disservice and is sloppy science.

Tyson is not a planetary scientist, and he is wrong about Pluto. You can find a petition of planetary astronomers who oppose Pluto's demotion here:
http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/planetprotest/

kired said...

I apologize if I implied that Pluto was an asteroid, that was not my intention.

Laurel Kornfeld said...

Thanks, I'm happy to hear that. I watched the interview online and then realized that the "asteroids" part referred to the second topic in his interview, the possibility of an asteroid hitting the Earth (that seems to be one of his all time favorite topics).